Oh no, not the Harvard Moral Psychology argument again, you already know normally the one regarding the individual that sees 5 people on the track below which has a fast moving train they cannot see, and yet another track with simply a single person on it, even though the individual from far away is sitting at the switch box to alter the train from one track to a new, what as long as they do? It's some of those moral dilemma challenges, if they switch the track they caused anyone to die, if they do nothing at all 5 everyone is likely to be killed, with seconds to act, what can they are doing?
Well, in walks the newest future arena of artificial intelligence and autonomous cars. Everyone's held it's place in situations we must avoid thing, and swerve we sometimes risk damaging our car to avoid hitting a kid who just rode outside in front people on his bicycle. So, here goes the process - you see;
There were a fascinating article in "Nature - International Weekly Journal of Science" titled; "Machine ethics: The robot's dilemma - Exercising developing ethical robots is amongst the thorniest challenges in Artificial Intelligence BI," by Boer Deng on July 1, 2015. This article stated:
"In May, a panel talk on driverless cars in the Brookings Institution, a think tank in Washington DC, converted into attorney at law regarding how autonomous vehicles would behave inside a crisis. Suppose a vehicle's efforts to save lots of a unique passengers by, say, slamming for the brakes risked a pile-up together with the vehicles behind it? Or let's say an autonomous car swerved in order to avoid a youngster, but risked hitting someone else nearby?"
Well, yes you will find those types of dilemmas before we into any of that, or logic based, probability rules, bankruptcy attorney las vegas more dilemmas which are even more serious to ponder the earlier. Let's talk shall we?
The truth is, what some inside the black-and-white whole world of programming fail to seem to comprehend is that laws, and rules should never be that, with there being exceptions and circumstances. Poorly programmed AI might be a disaster for "What's Right" from the eyes of these they are supposedly serving. Ethically speaking this indeed winds up going against everything we indicate in free country.
So how should programmers approach this dilemma because they pre-decide who might live or die in most hypothetic situation down the road? Yes, understand the philosophical moral quicksand here - much more of this as well as other challenges will observe these future concept autonomous cars, but mind you, they shall be here before very long.