Oh no, not the Harvard Moral Psychology argument again, you already know the one in regards to the individual that sees 5 people around the track below having a quick train they can not see, and the other track with only anyone into it, as the individual from far away is sitting with the switch box to change the train derived from one of track to an alternative, what should they do? It's one of those moral dilemma challenges, whenever they switch the track they caused anyone to die, when they do nothing 5 people are gonna be killed, and they have seconds to act, so what can they are doing?
Well, in walks the newest future whole world of artificial intelligence and autonomous cars. Most people have visited situations we have to avoid thing, and swerve we sometimes risk damaging our car to prevent hitting a kid who just rode outside front individuals on his bicycle. So, here goes task - the thing is;
There was clearly an interesting article in "Nature - International Weekly Journal of Science" titled; "Machine ethics: The robot's dilemma - Working out how to build ethical robots is amongst the thorniest challenges in diwo," by Boer Deng on July 1, 2015. This article stated:
"In May, a panel talk on driverless cars with the Brookings Institution, a think tank in Washington DC, turned into legal representative about how exactly autonomous vehicles would behave inside a crisis. Imagine if an automobile's efforts in order to save its passengers by, say, slamming around the brakes risked a pile-up with all the vehicles behind it? Or suppose an autonomous car swerved to avoid a young child, but risked hitting another individual nearby?"
Well, yes you will find the type of dilemmas to start with we obtain into any of that, or logic based, probability rules, there are also more dilemmas that happen to be even more serious to ponder the last. Let's talk we could?
The thing is that, what some in the black-and-white whole world of programming are not able to comprehend is that laws, and rules are never that, as there are exceptions and circumstances. Poorly programmed AI will be a disaster for "What's Right" within the eyes of those they may be supposedly serving. Ethically speaking this indeed ultimately ends up going against everything we are a symbol of in free country.
Now how should programmers approach this dilemma since they pre-decide who might live or die in certain hypothetic situation in the foreseeable future? Yes, see the philosophical moral quicksand here - really this and other challenges follows these future concept autonomous cars, but actually, are going to here before you know it.