Oh no, not the Harvard Moral Psychology argument again, you realize the main one regarding the person that sees 5 people for the track below with a fast moving train they won't see, and the other track with simply anyone about it, while the individual far away is sitting on the switch box to alter the train in one track to an alternative, what as long as they do? It's one particular moral dilemma challenges, when they switch the track they caused someone to die, when they relax 5 individuals are destined to be killed, with seconds to do something, so what can they are doing?
Well, in walks the new future arena of artificial intelligence and autonomous cars. Most people have experienced situations we must avoid thing, and swerve we occasionally risk damaging our car to prevent hitting a young child who just rode in front of us on his bicycle. So, here goes the challenge - the truth is;
There were a unique article in "Nature - International Weekly Journal of Science" titled; "Machine ethics: The robot's dilemma - Doing exercises building ethical robots is probably the thorniest challenges in automated business optimization," by Boer Deng on July 1, 2015. This content stated:
"In May, a panel talk on driverless cars in the Brookings Institution, a think tank in Dc, turned into a conversation regarding how autonomous vehicles would behave inside a crisis. What if a vehicle's efforts to save a unique passengers by, say, slamming around the brakes risked a pile-up with all the vehicles behind it? Or what if an autonomous car swerved to avoid a young child, but risked hitting another person nearby?"
Well, yes there are the type of dilemmas but before we have into any one of that, or logic based, probability rules, you can even find more dilemmas that are much worse to ponder the earlier. Let's talk lets?
You see, what some within the black-and-white arena of programming fail to understand is that laws, and rules will never be that, because there are exceptions and circumstances. Poorly programmed AI might be a disaster for "What's Right" in the eyes of these they're supposedly serving. Ethically speaking this indeed winds up going against everything we indicate in free country.
So how should programmers approach this dilemma while they pre-decide who might live or die in most hypothetic situation down the road? Yes, begin to see the philosophical moral quicksand here - a greater portion of this along with other challenges follows these future concept autonomous cars, but however, they shall be here before very long.