Not again, not the Harvard Moral Psychology argument again, you already know normally the one about the one that sees 5 people on the track below having a action-packed train they won't see, and the other track just one person about it, while the individual well away is sitting in the switch box to alter the train in one track to a different, what if and when they do? It's among those moral dilemma challenges, should they switch the track they caused anyone to die, should they do nothing at all 5 individuals are going to be killed, and they've seconds to act, exactly what do they do?
Well, in walks the modern future world of artificial intelligence and autonomous cars. Everyone's been in situations we must avoid thing, and swerve we occassionally risk damaging our car to stop hitting a young child who just rode out in front folks on his bicycle. So, here goes the process - the thing is;
There were an interesting article in "Nature - International Weekly Journal of Science" titled; "Machine ethics: The robot's dilemma - Working out developing ethical robots is amongst the thorniest challenges in diwo," by Boer Deng on July 1, 2015. The article stated:
"In May, a panel talk on driverless cars on the Brookings Institution, a think tank in Washington DC, changed into attorney at law regarding how autonomous vehicles would behave in the crisis. What if an automobile's efforts in order to save a unique passengers by, say, slamming on the brakes risked a pile-up with all the vehicles behind it? Or let's say an autonomous car swerved in order to avoid a kid, but risked hitting another individual nearby?"
Well, yes there are the type of dilemmas before we into some of that, or logic based, probability rules, there are also more dilemmas which are rather more serious to ponder the first sort. Let's talk shall we?
The truth is, what some inside the black-and-white world of programming neglect to understand is that laws, and rules will never be that, as there are exceptions and circumstances. Poorly programmed AI will be a disaster for "What's Right" inside the eyes of people these are supposedly serving. Ethically speaking this indeed ends up going against everything we are a symbol of in free country.
Now how should programmers approach this dilemma since they pre-decide who might live or die in most hypothetic situation later on? Yes, see the philosophical moral quicksand here - really this and other challenges will follow these future concept autonomous cars, but actually, they'll be here before very long.